[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnustep make question
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: gnustep make question |
Date: |
Tue, 6 May 2003 11:38:13 +0100 (BST) |
> > It still works, despite the warnings, as long as the directories are
> > included in the RESOURCE_FILES variable too.
>
> Hmmm. Yes, you are basically installing the directories manually.
>
> And btw it might no longer work with the latest gnustep-make ... I now
> realize there is a little mess there in the API which I need to think
> about and clean - some people assume that if they add "xxx/yyy" to their
> RESOURCE_FILES, the file will be copied into {bundle}/xxx/yyy; other
> people assume that if they add "xxx/yyy" to their RESOURCE_FILES, the file
> will be copied into {bundle}/yyy. A few days ago I changed the behaviour
> from installing into {bundle}/yyy to installing into {bundle}/xxx/yyy
> after a bug report, but I'm no longer sure that was a great idea - I
> hadn't realized the obvious - that other people might need {bundle}/yyy.
> Maybe we need two separate variables for the two behaviours. Mumble
> mumble.
I got another complaint (from people in my own company!) that I had broken
makefiles with this change, so I reverted (part of) it. :-)
Need to think more.