Re: Frameworks and static libs

[Eric Heintzmann]

On lun, 2004-01-12 at 13:48, Nicola Pero wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I tried to compile netclasses and addresses with the shared=no flag but
> > I obtain only shared libs (libAddresses.so.1.0.0 for exemple).
> > And no static libs !!
> > 
> > Is it ok, or is there a bug in gnustep-make ?
> 
> Are those things frameworks ?
Yes, they are.

>   If so, by definition, frameworks are shared
> libraries; in theory it makes no sense to compile them as static
> libraries.
Why ?

> 
> I've changed gnustep-make to emit a warning if you try to build a static 
> framework, and force shared=yes in that case.
> 
I m triyng to package addresses for debian.
The debian policy says that shared and static libs should be provided.
This is why, I tried to use shared=no.

        Eric