Re: [Help-gsl] looking for gsl_integration_long_double

[Oliver Jennrich]

On 5/25/07, Evgeny Kurbatov <address@hidden> wrote:
> Tobias Munk wrote:
> > I am looking for a integration routine with "long double" type, and cannot 
> find anything
> > in the gsl. Has anyone already thought of implementing something like this?
> Please tell, what the task you solve with such requirement to precision?

Well, does it matter what reason Tobias has? He is looking for a 'long
double' integration and there isn't any. Sounds like a good reason to
me.

*My* reason for wanting such a thing would be simply that all the rest
of the program is using long double in the numerics part and sometimes
the easiest way to check for error propagation is to require higher
precision and check for the changes in the result.


--
Space -- the final frontier