[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers
From: |
Alan Fung |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:48:15 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Brian Gladman <brg <at> gladman.plus.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you believe that this is a GSL issue, would it be possible to produce
> a simple example that illustrates the problem?
>
> Brian Gladman
>
>
Hi,
See my latest followup of my post.
With revision 4771, the calculation will slow down.
Also, I found that numerical results by 1.16 and 1.15 are different (less
than 0.1%). I doubt it is because of revision 4771. I have modified the
source code of 1.16 to undo revision 4771. And I found that, without 4771,
results by 1.16 and 1.15 are the same with each other. So, I question
whether revision 4771 do a better job or a worse job, in terms of accuracy.
Alan
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Alan Fung, 2013/11/05
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Alan Fung, 2013/11/05
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Rhys Ulerich, 2013/11/05
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Tuomo Keskitalo, 2013/11/05
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Alan Fung, 2013/11/05
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Rhys Ulerich, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Alan Fung, 2013/11/06
- Re: [Help-gsl] ode version and compilers, Tuomo Keskitalo, 2013/11/06