[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output
From: |
Olivier Dion |
Subject: |
Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:53:00 -0400 |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
> Exactly the same way. The first argument to WITH-CHANNELS would be
> (cons C G) and thus P and D would be picked from the set of C and G. C
> and G can be specified with exact commits or branches, just like the
> --channels option to “guix time-machine”.
>
> We already have all the tools for WITH-CHANNELS — that’s (guix
> inferior). We just don’t have a convenient syntax to do this without a
> lot of boilerplate.
Right. It would be great I think. However, time-machine does the job
for now, at least for my case. But it would definitely allow for better
channel granularity. To continue!
--
Olivier Dion
oldiob.dev
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, (continued)
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/28
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, zimoun, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output,
Olivier Dion <=
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, zimoun, 2022/04/29