Re: Avoid sending sources to offload servers

[Edouard Klein]

I may be mistaken, but you I think you can run guix build a with
offloading, and guix build b c without, then when you run guix shell, a,
b, and c will all be in your store and won't need to be rebuilt.


Simen Endsjø <contact@simendsjo.me> writes:

> Yes, that's what I'm using, but it's not granular. The problem is things like 
> `guix shell a b c`.
> - a has a small source and long build time
> - b has a large source and short build time
> - c has a large output
>
> a is no problem to offload, but b will cause a lot of unnecessary traffic, 
> and I might want to run c locally to to avoid passing a lot of data.
>
> I cannot tell --no-offload skip b and c, so If I have a single problematic 
> package in my system, home or in a guix shell, I have to disable offloading 
> for all packages.
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024, at 10:14, Hilton Chain wrote:
>> Hi Simen,
>>
>> On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:57:26 +0800,
>> Simen Endsjø wrote:
>> >
>> > I notice package sources are sent to offload servers. I have a build that 
>> > has
>> > 1.9GB sources, and results in a 4.7GB store item. I would have thought 
>> > only the
>> > definitions were sent to the build machine, and it would download the 1.9GB
>> > file, but it seems this file is sent from my machine. I cannot see a way 
>> > around
>> > this, and it makes it difficult to combine this package with packages I 
>> > wish to
>> > offload as I cannot state certain packages shouldn't be offloaded.
>> >
>> > Not sure what I'm asking here, just wanted to point out an issue which 
>> > causes
>> > problems.
>>
>> Guix commands that can spawn builds have a ‘--no-offload’ option, you can see
>> more these options here[1].
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> ---
>> [1]: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Common-Build-Options.html
>>