[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd on old computers
From: |
Jonathan Hunt |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd on old computers |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:51:41 +0800 |
Hi,
Interesting... so that's explains why I couldn't get it to boot. I hate to
ask but any ideas on how this compares to linux (I was booting linux on the
same machine).
On Friday 01 June 2001 03:24, you wrote:
> I was playing around with vmstat a while back, and think this
> discussion finally gives me an excuse to post the measurements. :)
>
> For my system running Debian GNU/Hurd (gnumach+hurd 20000301 CVS),
> with no additional daemons or much else out of the ordinary, the
> memory usage looked like:
> active inactive wired
>
> |------|--------|-----
>
> To login: 5.69M 6.17M 2.08M
> Within emacs (on console): 7.66M 9.72M 2.29M
> Within XFree-3.3.6 (2 xterms and little else): 11M 11.6M 2.77M
> Compiling gnumach (on console, peak values): 15.6M 12.3M 3.33M
>
> So you're looking at needing at least 16 megabytes of memory
> (preferably RAM) to boot, and ~32 meg for any serious compiling. The
> scrawniest machine I've personally tried GNU/Hurd on was a 486DX50 w/
> 20 meg of RAM, and while it did work, it wasn't very fun. (I never did
> get it to completely compile the hurd sources; I think I estimated it
> would take over 10 hours, and as someone who has to pay for his
> electricity usage from his own pocket...)
--
Jonathan Hunt (The Real Jonathan Hunt) <jhuntnz@users.sf.net>
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose."
Jim Elliot