[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd direction
From: |
Farid Hajji |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd direction |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:35:33 +0200 |
Hi Wolfgang,
> http://www.adhocinc.com/hurd/Learning-Hurd-HOWTO.html says:
>
> "The next release of the Hurd (0.3) will be the last of the GNUMach
> microkernel, with later releases being based on L4 and possibly other
> microkernels."
>
> Is this correct?
Hmmm... that seems overoptimistic right now. The Hurd is very closely
tied to Mach at the moment. Porting it to other uKernels like say, L4,
would require IMHO a total redesign of some crucial parts. This looks
more like a 0.x to 1.x (or even 1.x -> 2.x) transition!
Of course, I don't mean a Hurd/Mach-Emulation/L4 port or something
like this, but a true Hurd/L4 or Hurd/<some_other_uKernel> port.
This said, I have no idea about the FSF's policy w.r.t. bumping version
numbers of the Hurd.
Regards,
-Farid.
--
Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Admin | Phone: +49-2131-67-555
Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany | farid.hajji@ob.kamp.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - -
One OS To Rule Them All And In The Darkness Bind Them... --Bill Gates.
- Hurd direction, Wolfgang, 2001/07/17
- Re: Hurd direction, Moritz Schulte, 2001/07/17
- Re: Hurd direction,
Farid Hajji <=
- Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), exa, 2001/07/17
- Re: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), Farid Hajji, 2001/07/17
- Re: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), exa, 2001/07/21
- Re: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), Farid Hajji, 2001/07/22
- Re: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), Nicolas George, 2001/07/23
- Re[2]: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), dim, 2001/07/23
- Re: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/07/23
- Re: Using Objective-C or x (Re: Hurd direction), Farid Hajji, 2001/07/24
Re: Hurd direction, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/19