[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Richard Kreuter |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Sat, 11 May 2002 17:45:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 06:26:58PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:45:24PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote:
> >
> > 6.2.x /usr : Secondary Hierarchy
> >
> > In the GNU system, /usr is a symbolic link to /. The / and /usr
>
> Note that it is currently a symbolic link to '.' not '/.'. with the same
> functionality but a violation of the draft strictly speaking
The offending sentence is not my wording.
I believe the dot after the second slash in the line is an
end-of-sentence punctuation mark. Does this read better:
"In the GNU system, /usr is a symbolic link to /, the root directory."
?
Thanks,
Richard
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/05/05
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/11
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Moritz Schulte, 2002/05/11
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12