[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Grant Bowman |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2002 00:50:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
* Richard Kreuter <kreuter@ausar.rutgers.edu> [020512 22:44]:
> GNU specific annex:
>
> 6.2 GNU
>
> This is the annex for the GNU operating system. We sometimes refer
> to this as the GNU/Hurd system, in cases where it is necessary to
> distinguish the GNU system from other systems that use large amounts
> of GNU software.
Good, but I think this does not acknowledge that GNU/Linux is still a
GNU system.
> The GNU system is special compared to other UNIX-like operating
> systems in the way it treats the filesystem namespace. The filesystem
> namespace is very flexible, you can do anything with it what you
> want. That's why it is reasonable to specify where you should find
> directories and files, but not the way those directories and files
> should get there.
>
> As a rule, distributors who wish to maintain compatibility between
> their distributions of GNU/Hurd, GNU/Linux, or other systems may
> maintain symbolic links to files whose locations on GNU systems differ
GNU/Hurd?
> from their locations on other systems. This accomodates programs with
> "hard-coded" filenames. For example, files that should be found under
> /libexec may be symbolic links, or may be the targets of symbolic
> links located under /sbin, /bin, and so forth.
Generally, I think GNU alone is ambiguous and shouldn't be used given
the climate today.
--
-- Grant Bowman <grantbow@grantbow.com>
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Moritz Schulte, 2002/05/11
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/12
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
Grant Bowman <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Robert Millan, 2002/05/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Grant Bowman, 2002/05/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Robert Millan, 2002/05/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Gerhard Muntingh, 2002/05/22
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/21
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/05/21
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/05/22