[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS.
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS. |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2002 22:29:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:59:52PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to explain section 3 in more detail? I am
> referring to this paragraph in the rational:
>
> Software must never create or require special files or subdirectories in
> the root directory. Other locations in the FHS hierarchy provide more
> than enough flexibility for any package.
>
> I still can't figure out for the life of me if it is about
> third-party software (software that is installed by the system
> administrator) or about the actual distribution. I believe that this
> would clarify a lot of the confusion that has been going on
> debian-hurd/debian-devel. I.e. if a different operating system (GNU
> in this case) can make directories in the root directory (/libexec,
> /hurd, /servers).
It's for third-pary software and it's in the rationale so we can do
everything we like. I agree that it should be more clear.
Jeroen Dekkers
--
Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org IRC ID: jeroen@openprojects
GNU supporter - http://www.gnu.org
pgpsnS2z1v_bL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/22