[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Appropriate compiler for hurd?
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: Appropriate compiler for hurd? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:23:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
No. gcc-3.1 should be the onyl one that you use.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Donald Ziesig wrote:
> >From http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
>
> 24 May 2002
> .... Note that we have also switched to GCC 3.1 as our default compiler. ...
>
> Does the gcc-2.95 compiler work too? I now have them both so I can use
> either.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Bailey" <jbailey@nisa.net>
> To: <ja2morri@student.math.uwaterloo.ca>
> Cc: "Donald Ziesig" <dziesig@bellsouth.net>; <help-hurd@gnu.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 12:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Appropriate compiler for hurd?
>
>
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 06:52:54AM -0700, James Morrison wrote:
> >
> > > apt-get install gcc-i386-gnu
> >
> > This is currently a gcc-2.95 compiler. It may not give you what you
> > want for anything other than gnumach.
> >
> > --
> > One of the great things about books is sometimes
> > there are some fantastic pictures.
> > -- George W. Bush
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Help-hurd mailing list
> > Help-hurd@gnu.org
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
> >
>
>
--
One of the great things about books is sometimes
there are some fantastic pictures.
-- George W. Bush