[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "large" partitions support ?
From: |
Wolfgang Jährling |
Subject: |
Re: "large" partitions support ? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 22:35:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.0.1i |
Wolfgang Jährling <wolfgang@pro-linux.de> wrote:
> In my understanding, this is done because this way the caching
> strategy (what to cache and also how much) can be done by someone
> else.
It came to my mind that a more important reason might be that when using
our own cache in the file systems, this cache is likely to be paged out,
which means that we have to page it in from swap just to page it out to
the store.
Ok, back to the stuff where I am actually able to do something useful. :)
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <wolfgang@pro-linux.de> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-guide/
["We're way ahead of you here. The Hurd has always been on the ]
[ cutting edge of not being good for anything." -- Roland McGrath ]
- "large" partitions support ?, Olivier Galibert, 2002/08/02
- Re: "large" partitions support ?, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/03
- Re: "large" partitions support ?, Niels Möller, 2002/08/05
- Re: "large" partitions support ?,
Wolfgang Jährling <=
- Re: "large" partitions support ?, Ognyan Kulev, 2002/08/06
- Re: "large" partitions support ?, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/08/06
- Re: "large" partitions support ?, Ognyan Kulev, 2002/08/06
- Re: "large" partitions support ?, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/08/06