[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
If QNX is successful, why NOT GNU Microkernels
|
From: |
Anand Raj |
|
Subject: |
If QNX is successful, why NOT GNU Microkernels |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:25:14 -0800 (PST) |
Hi all,
QNX is able to be a successful MicroKernel, but why NOT GNUMach / OSKITMach / L4Mach ? So, what could be the problem with GNU Microkernels ? QNX is using GNU tools and they are successful. Where we are lacking ? coding style / documentation / info on creating a MicroKernel ? QNX don't have partition limitation like we have with ext2. Even device driver is also implemented without any problem...
Thanks
Anandraj
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes