Re: If QNX is successful, why NOT GNU Microkernels

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   The gnu.org Hurd page is pityful in that aspect, all the features
   it cites are covered by current monolithic kernels.  The Hurd on L4
   page boils down to "L4 is better than Mach" (well _duh_), and half
   its "Related item" links are dead.

If you have _constructive_ criticism about the web page, then send a
patch or suuggestions about how to improve it, if you can't do that,
don't open your mouth about it.


Cheers.