[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: PATCH: broken handling of alternate separators in java
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: AW: PATCH: broken handling of alternate separators in java |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:40:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Thanks, Stephane. Installed in CVS.
/Simon
"Stephane Mikaty" <address@hidden> writes:
> This syntax is only recognized from java 1.5, and not supported by gcj (yet).
>
> Replace with:
>
> for ( int i = 0; i < tests.length ; i++ ) {
> assert IDNA.toASCII( tests[i] ).equals( "domain.invalid" );
> }
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Simon Josefsson [mailto:address@hidden
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 16:04
> An: Stephane Mikaty
> Cc: address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: PATCH: broken handling of alternate separators in java
>
>
> "Stephane Mikaty" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> +import gnu.inet.encoding.*;
>> +
>> +public class IDNATest {
>> +
>> + public static void main( String[] args ) throws Exception {
>> + String[] tests = new String[] {
>> + "domain\u3002invalid",
>> + "domain\uFF0Einvalid",
>> + "domain\uFF61invalid",
>> + };
>> + for ( String test : tests ) {
>> + assert IDNA.toASCII( test ).equals( "domain.invalid" );
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> +}
>
> When I tested this part of the patch (which is now merged with
> TestIDNA.java in CVS), I got errors from gcj:
>
> TestIDNA.java:57: error: Invalid declaration.
> for ( String test : tests ) {
>
> I'm not a Java programmer, is your syntax correct here?
>
> /Simon
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: AW: PATCH: broken handling of alternate separators in java,
Simon Josefsson <=