Re: AW: treatment of U+002E that is produced by NFKC

[Simon Josefsson]

"Erik van der Poel" <address@hidden> writes:

>> Ok.  Pointers to the mailing list may suffice if we can give a good
>> explanation of the problem.
>
> This is the beginning of the thread (even though it includes an
> excerpt from an earlier thread):
>
> http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2008-January/000811.html

Thanks.  I'm reviewing the current IDNAbis specification to see if they
handle backwards compatibility OK with regard to something like this,
and will hopefully send comments to the idna-update list.

/Simon