[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Antwort: Re: wrong compiler flag detection
From: |
jens . rehsack |
Subject: |
Antwort: Re: wrong compiler flag detection |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:42:03 +0100 |
Hi Simon,
I've seen the new release came out will I was sick and it contains the
fix. I tried it on AIX and it works well.
Thanks for your work.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Jens Rehsack
_________________________________________
Fa. Manß & Partner
Fa. Manß & Partner
Gebäude B151
51368 Leverkusen, Deutschland
Tel: +49 - 214 - 30 - 41 562
Fax: +49 - 214 - 30 - 31 625
E-Mail: address@hidden
Web: http://www.BayerBBS.com
Geschäftsführung: Vorsitzender Daniel Hartert | Arbeitsdirektor
Norbert Fieseler
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Klaus Kühn
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leverkusen | Amtsgericht Köln, HRB 49895
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden>
06.03.2009 18:29
An
address@hidden
Kopie
address@hidden
Thema
Re: wrong compiler flag detection
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden writes:
>
>> ld: 0706-005 Cannot find or open file: diagnostics-show-option
>> ld:fopen(): No such file or directory
>> *** Error code 255
>
> Hi! Thanks for the report.
>
> Ouch. Libidn checks whether -fdiagnostics-show-option is supported by
> the compiler before using it, but it seems this parameter has another
> meaning for xlc compared to gcc. As a work around, you can build libidn
> using 'make WARN_CFLAGS=' to avoid passing these extra flags to the
> compiler.
>
> I'm not sure how to fix this cleanly. Ideas welcome. I'll try to think
> about it as well.
I have changed so that the many warning flags are only tested for when
using gcc. This should solve this problem for xlc, I think. Please
confirm that the upcoming release fixes this for you.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libidn.git/commit/?id=fa40eeae60b65dbb0d57ab3e24d7e33c4bff1857
Thanks,
Simon