[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bug#1066855: drop libidn11-dev
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Bug#1066855: drop libidn11-dev |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:35:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> The transitional libidn11-dev package can be dropped when all reverse
>> dependencies have stopped using it.
> Looks to me like we're there.
>
>> root@68d340bc8331:/# apt-cache rdepends libidn11-dev
> libidn11-dev`
> Reverse Depends:
> libidn-dev
> libidn-dev
Good!
> udd=> select source from sources where build_depends like '%libidn11-dev%'
> and release = 'sid' ;
> source
> --------------------
> biboumi
> courier
> courier
> courier-authlib
> eiskaltdcpp
> foxeye
> hesiod
> jabber-muc
> jreen
> libnet-libidn-perl
> libpodofo
> nextepc
> psi
> psi-plus
> (14 rows)
>
> So so long as libidn-dev gains Provides: libidn11-dev, this should be good?
Nice list. Hmm, is it really sufficient with a Provides to get apt to
install libidn-dev, when building those packages? Don't we have to file
bugs on all of those packages?
/Simon
jas@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn -b libidn11-dev
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
libidn11-dev | 1.42-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el,
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
Maintainer: Debian Libidn Team <help-libidn@gnu.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
biboumi: libidn11-dev
courier: libidn11-dev
courier-authlib: libidn11-dev
eiskaltdcpp: libidn11-dev
foxeye: libidn11-dev
hesiod: libidn11-dev
jabber-muc: libidn11-dev
jreen: libidn11-dev
libnet-libidn-perl: libidn11-dev
libpodofo: libidn11-dev
nextepc: libidn11-dev
psi: libidn11-dev
psi-plus: libidn11-dev
Dependency problem found.
jas@coccia:~$
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature