[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time stamp resolution
From: |
Frank Küster |
Subject: |
Re: Time stamp resolution |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:08:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Jason Pearce <address@hidden> wrote:
> Can someone please try the following for me
>
[...]
> Now thats from CYGWIN and it works as expected. From the other
> machines I get this
>
> england4% touch foo2 ; touch foo1 ; ls -lrt foo*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jasonp games 0 Jan 24 17:04 foo2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jasonp games 0 Jan 24 17:04 foo1
> england4% touch foo1 ; touch foo2 ; ls -lrt foo*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jasonp None 0 Jan 24 17:04 foo2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jasonp None 0 Jan 24 17:04 foo1
> NOT what I'd expect.
I get the same on Debian Linux (woody+many backports)
$ touch foo2 ; touch foo1 ; ls -lrt --full-time foo*
-rw-r--r-- 1 frank frank 0 2005-01-25 09:06:14.000000000 +0100
foo2
-rw-r--r-- 1 frank frank 0 2005-01-25 09:06:14.000000000 +0100
foo1
I once had a case where a makefile relied on time stamps of files that
were created by a patch. On my system it worked, the second file in the
patch was always newer than the first one. On a faster system, the
timestamps were identical, as here.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer