[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: White Space Problems--Again
From: |
Tom Browder |
Subject: |
Re: White Space Problems--Again |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:26:45 -0500 |
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> The reality is that make's escaping features are inconsistent at best
> and fairly useless at worst. The trailing whitespace thing is really
> only the tip of the iceberg. But, it's a large iceberg and virtually
> any possible solution would mean breaking lots of existing makefiles.
> That's the problem with a legacy application like make.
But what about changing the behavior as a user-selectable option (and
have it recognized by a special MAKE_?) environment variable)?
> The people who wrote POSIX have used many, many more various
> implementations of make than almost anyone reading this list. And, make
> was commonplace long before POSIX was even a glimmer in someone's eye.
I know---that was a stupid statement I made.
Thanks, Paul.
-Tom
- White Space Problems--Again, Tom Browder, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Rick Flower, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Philip Guenther, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Tom Browder, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Stephan Beal, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Tom Browder, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Stephan Beal, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Tom Browder, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Paul Smith, 2009/03/28
- Re: White Space Problems--Again,
Tom Browder <=
- Re: White Space Problems--Again, Greg Chicares, 2009/03/28