[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: load average and parallel execution
From: |
ali hagigat |
Subject: |
Re: load average and parallel execution |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:19 +0330 |
it does not make sense we specify -l 2.5 and then use -l on command
line, if we write:
make -l 2.5
will sub-makes inherit "-l 2.5" from their parent?
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Luke Shumaker <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 07:51 +0330, ali hagigat wrote:
>> The ‘-l’ option with no following number removes the load limit, if
>> one was given with a previous ‘-l’ option.
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> How -l option without number removes the limit? I use make -l 2.5 -l?
>> Does it make sense?
>
> make -l 2.5 -l
> does not set a load limit. The first -l sets it, then the second unsets
> it.
>
> --
> ~ LukeShu
> http://lukeshu.ath.cx/
>
>
- load average and parallel execution, ali hagigat, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Sam Ravnborg, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Sam Ravnborg, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, ali hagigat, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, ali hagigat, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Luke Shumaker, 2011/01/17
- Re: load average and parallel execution,
ali hagigat <=
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/18
- Re: load average and parallel execution, Luke Shumaker, 2011/01/18