[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Naming convention for included make files?
From: |
Sean Hammond |
Subject: |
Naming convention for included make files? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:07:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-757-gc3ad9c75d3-fm-20220722.001-gc3ad9c75 |
Hi,
I understand that `Makefile` is the conventional name for a root make file, but
is there a naming convention for files included using the `include` directive?
>From examples in the manual I'd guess that it's `foo.mk` (all lower-case, .mk
>filename extension).
Alternative suggestions that I've received are `makefile_foo.mk` or
`MakefileFoo.mk` (which seem redundant to me) or `Makefile.foo` (which works
but seems like a poor idea to me because `foo` could appear to be the file
type). The argument for naming them all `Makefile*` is that they'll sort next
to each other in file listings.
Thanks
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Naming convention for included make files?,
Sean Hammond <=