|
From: | Jay |
Subject: | RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX |
Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:37:57 +0000 |
Trying again, without the attachments. - Jay From: address@hidden To: address@hidden CC: address@hidden Subject: RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:37:18 +0000 Hi Chris, it doesn't work. The relevant code in configure doesn't run. config.log: | | if (regcomp(&r, "\\>", REG_EXTENDED|REG_NOSUB)) | return 1; | if (regexec(&r, "word boundary", nmatch, &pmatch, 0)) | return 1; | return 0; | } configure:6709: result: no configure:6842: checking whether to enable UTF-8 support configure:6855: result: auto configure:6858: checking whether to use slang configure:7749: result: no configure:7843: checking for getdelim configure:7899: gcc -o conftest -O2 conftest.c >&5 ld: Unsatisfied symbol "getdelim" in file /var/tmp//ccofn2wV.o 1 errors. Your code is around line 6716. Attached config.log and config.h. - Jay > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:56:42 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX > From: address@hidden > To: address@hidden > CC: address@hidden > > Hi Jay, > > I would rather just put feature-specific checks in configure.ac > whenever possible. I took a crack at this, can you try the tarball at > http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/test/nano-2.1.9-svn-xopenchk.tar.gz > and let me know whether it works for you? Thanks much. > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote: > > Chris, no problem, no rush. It is working for me. > > tarball or svn should be ok. > > (I've never used command line svn, but have used cvs, so... and I don't have > > svn on this machine yet, but can always go through another..) > > > > > > If you are worried about: > > > > > > fips_rand.c:59:1: warning: "_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED" redefined > > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1026&user=guest&pass=guest > > > > > > You can either do > > #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED > > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED > > Are there values other than 1? > > Like defining it to a date/version-thing? > > > > > > or #ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED > > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED > > #endif > > > > > > but having configure only #define it if it "helps" is also reasonable. > > Maybe there are other problems. > > > > > > Another thing you can do, a little icky maybe, but maybe nicer than adding > > configurey :) > > is isolating the code that needs it so as to minimize the risk. You know, > > little wrapper functions and extern consts, with some alternate names, that > > just wrap the "real" stuff. > > Perhaps that's not the best source organization though. > > > > > > stdarg.h you can either put in unconditionally, should be safe. > > This system has a K&R compiler but I think still has stdarg.h. > > As well, it need only go in under the same situation -- tied to the use of > > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED. > > > > > > SIMILARY, I had some source yesterday (not nano, not HP-UX) that required > > #define _GNU_SOURCE or such. > > g++ predefined it, gcc did not. So I had to do that #undef to fix that very > > same warning. > > It was C code but I like to check that it compiles as C++ too. > > > > > > - Jay > > > > > >> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:44:07 -0500 > >> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX > >> From: address@hidden > >> To: address@hidden > >> CC: address@hidden > >> > >> Hi Jay, > >> > >> Thanks for this report. Unfortunately, from what i read about > >> _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED it sounds like it may change other behaviors as > >> well by defining it. I think I will have to add a check to the > >> configure script to test whether the colors are available without > >> defining _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, and then try it with the flag and set > >> it properly if needed, and then if needed define it. This will > >> probably take a day or two, but are you willing to test out a tarball > >> if I create one for you, or do you have subversion access? > >> > >> The stdarg stuff should be easy to check for as well via configure. > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote: > >> > > >> > The include is of stdarg.h with angle brackets. > >> > My email is getting munged, sorry. > >> > > >> > - Jay > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ---------------------------------------- > >> >> From: address@hidden > >> >> To: address@hidden > >> >> Subject: FW: compiling nano on HP-UX > >> >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:34:44 +0000 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> [bounced there] > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> From: jay.krell@ > >> >> To: nano-devel@ > >> >> Subject: compiling nano on HP-UX > >> >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:20:58 +0000 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> nano-2.1.9 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -bash-3.2$ gcc -v > >> >> Reading specs from > >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/3.3.6/specs > >> >> Configured with: /src/gcc-3.3.6/configure -verbose > >> >> -with-as=/usr/local/bin/gas -with-gnu-as > >> >> Thread model: single > >> >> gcc version 3.3.6 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -bash-3.2$ uname -a > >> >> HP-UX jkhpux1 B.11.11 U 9000/800 1595760578 unlimited-user license > >> >> This is I think "11v1". > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> color.c: In function `color_init': > >> >> color.c:86: error: `COLOR_WHITE' undeclared (first use in this > >> >> function) > >> >> color.c:86: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > >> >> color.c:86: error: for each function it appears in.) > >> >> color.c:93: error: `COLOR_BLACK' undeclared (first use in this > >> >> function) > >> >> gmake: *** [color.o] Error 1 > >> >> -bash-3.2$ pwd > >> >> /src/nano-2.1.9/src > >> >> -bash-3.2$ cp color.c color.c.orig > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> put #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED at the top of color.c > >> >> => > >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/3.3.6/include/curses.h:755: > >> >> error: syntax error > >> >> before "va_list" > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> put #include at the top of color.c > >> >> => works > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I don't have GNU diff yet: > >> >> -bash-3.2$ diff color.c.orig color.c > >> >> 23a24,25 > >> >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED > >> >>> #include > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Either order compiles, but this seems better. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> rcfile.c: In function `color_to_short': > >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: `COLOR_GREEN' undeclared (first use in this > >> >> function) > >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: for each function it appears in.) > >> >> rcfile.c:545: error: `COLOR_RED' undeclared (first use in this > >> >> function) > >> >> > >> >> same thing. > >> >> > >> >> -bash-3.2$ diff rcfile.c.orig rcfile.c > >> >> 23a24,25 > >> >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED > >> >>> #include > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> and then it builds and works. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> - Jay > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Help-nano mailing list > >> > address@hidden > >> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-nano > >> > > > |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |