help-nano
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX


From: Jay
Subject: RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:37:57 +0000

Trying again, without the attachments.
 
 - Jay





 

From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:37:18 +0000

Hi Chris, it doesn't work.
The relevant code in configure doesn't run.
 
config.log:
 
|
|     if (regcomp(&r, "\\>", REG_EXTENDED|REG_NOSUB))
|         return 1;
|     if (regexec(&r, "word boundary", nmatch, &pmatch, 0))
|         return 1;
|     return 0;
| }
configure:6709: result: no
configure:6842: checking whether to enable UTF-8 support
configure:6855: result: auto
configure:6858: checking whether to use slang
configure:7749: result: no
configure:7843: checking for getdelim
configure:7899: gcc -o conftest -O2   conftest.c  >&5
ld: Unsatisfied symbol "getdelim" in file /var/tmp//ccofn2wV.o
1 errors.
 

Your code is around line 6716.


Attached config.log and config.h.
 
 - Jay

 
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:56:42 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> I would rather just put feature-specific checks in configure.ac
> whenever possible. I took a crack at this, can you try the tarball at
> http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/test/nano-2.1.9-svn-xopenchk.tar.gz
> and let me know whether it works for you? Thanks much.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Chris, no problem, no rush. It is working for me.
> > tarball or svn should be ok.
> > (I've never used command line svn, but have used cvs, so... and I don't have
> > svn on this machine yet, but can always go through another..)
> >
> >
> > If you are worried about:
> >
> >
> > fips_rand.c:59:1: warning: "_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED" redefined
> > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1026&user=guest&pass=guest
> >
> >
> > You can either do
> > #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> > Are there values other than 1?
> > Like defining it to a date/version-thing?
> >
> >
> > or #ifndef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> > #endif
> >
> >
> > but having configure only #define it if it "helps" is also reasonable.
> > Maybe there are other problems.
> >
> >
> > Another thing you can do, a little icky maybe, but maybe nicer than adding
> > configurey :)
> > is isolating the code that needs it so as to minimize the risk. You know,
> > little wrapper functions and extern consts, with some alternate names, that
> > just wrap the "real" stuff.
> > Perhaps that's not the best source organization though.
> >
> >
> > stdarg.h you can either put in unconditionally, should be safe.
> > This system has a K&R compiler but I think still has stdarg.h.
> > As well, it need only go in under the same situation -- tied to the use of
> > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED.
> >
> >
> > SIMILARY, I had some source yesterday (not nano, not HP-UX) that required
> > #define _GNU_SOURCE or such.
> > g++ predefined it, gcc did not. So I had to do that #undef to fix that very
> > same warning.
> > It was C code but I like to check that it compiles as C++ too.
> >
> >
> > - Jay
> >
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:44:07 -0500
> >> Subject: Re: [Help-nano] RE: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> From: address@hidden
> >> To: address@hidden
> >> CC: address@hidden
> >>
> >> Hi Jay,
> >>
> >> Thanks for this report. Unfortunately, from what i read about
> >> _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED it sounds like it may change other behaviors as
> >> well by defining it. I think I will have to add a check to the
> >> configure script to test whether the colors are available without
> >> defining _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, and then try it with the flag and set
> >> it properly if needed, and then if needed define it. This will
> >> probably take a day or two, but are you willing to test out a tarball
> >> if I create one for you, or do you have subversion access?
> >>
> >> The stdarg stuff should be easy to check for as well via configure.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Jay <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The include is of stdarg.h with angle brackets.
> >> > My email is getting munged, sorry.
> >> >
> >> > - Jay
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----------------------------------------
> >> >> From: address@hidden
> >> >> To: address@hidden
> >> >> Subject: FW: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:34:44 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> [bounced there]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> From: jay.krell@
> >> >> To: nano-devel@
> >> >> Subject: compiling nano on HP-UX
> >> >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:20:58 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> nano-2.1.9
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -bash-3.2$ gcc -v
> >> >> Reading specs from
> >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/3.3.6/specs
> >> >> Configured with: /src/gcc-3.3.6/configure -verbose
> >> >> -with-as=/usr/local/bin/gas -with-gnu-as
> >> >> Thread model: single
> >> >> gcc version 3.3.6
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -bash-3.2$ uname -a
> >> >> HP-UX jkhpux1 B.11.11 U 9000/800 1595760578 unlimited-user license
> >> >> This is I think "11v1".
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> color.c: In function `color_init':
> >> >> color.c:86: error: `COLOR_WHITE' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> function)
> >> >> color.c:86: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> >> >> color.c:86: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >> >> color.c:93: error: `COLOR_BLACK' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> function)
> >> >> gmake: *** [color.o] Error 1
> >> >> -bash-3.2$ pwd
> >> >> /src/nano-2.1.9/src
> >> >> -bash-3.2$ cp color.c color.c.orig
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> put #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED at the top of color.c
> >> >> =>
> >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/3.3.6/include/curses.h:755:
> >> >> error: syntax error
> >> >> before "va_list"
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> put #include at the top of color.c
> >> >> => works
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't have GNU diff yet:
> >> >> -bash-3.2$ diff color.c.orig color.c
> >> >> 23a24,25
> >> >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> >>> #include
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Either order compiles, but this seems better.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> rcfile.c: In function `color_to_short':
> >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: `COLOR_GREEN' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> function)
> >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> >> >> rcfile.c:543: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >> >> rcfile.c:545: error: `COLOR_RED' undeclared (first use in this
> >> >> function)
> >> >>
> >> >> same thing.
> >> >>
> >> >> -bash-3.2$ diff rcfile.c.orig rcfile.c
> >> >> 23a24,25
> >> >>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
> >> >>> #include
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> and then it builds and works.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> - Jay
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Help-nano mailing list
> >> > address@hidden
> >> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-nano
> >> >
> >

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]