[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ...
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ... |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:47:48 -0400 |
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Alois Schlögl <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm willing to sponsor the builtin vec() function for Octave. It's not
> that I personally have an immediate need for it; its because I see the
> possible advantages in terms of compatibility and performance (i.e. user
> experience) with Octave.
Why not just use the already builtin reshape()? It's more likely to be
optimized already on Matlab anyway.
--judd
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, (continued)
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Francesco Potortì, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Søren Hauberg, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/08
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/08
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/08
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Thomas Weber, 2010/06/08
- builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ..., Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/09
- Re: builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ...,
Judd Storrs <=
- Re: builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ..., Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/10
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/07
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alvin Wibowo, 2010/06/07
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Matthias Brennwald, 2010/06/08