|
From: | Michael V |
Subject: | RE: Matlab equivalents needed (yes very original) |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:40:02 -0700 |
If you run many short simulations then PIDs may get recycled. But hostname will work with a bit of a tweak. Thanks. On the other side, looking at mkstemp C code, it is very simple. Should be doable in Matlab in short order. Michael > Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:23:25 -0700 > From: address@hidden > Subject: RE: Matlab equivalents needed (yes very original) > To: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden > > > --- On Mon, 6/28/10, Michael V <address@hidden> wrote: > > From: Michael V <address@hidden> > Subject: RE: Matlab equivalents needed (yes very original) > To: address@hidden, address@hidden > Date: Monday, June 28, 2010, 5:26 PM > > > > > So are any of these cluster-safe? If I have say 160 CPUs running 160 processes (1 per CPU) and > all processes write to same directory on same hard drive, is there a chance of conflict? > Also, is there an implementation of these for Matlab? I do not want to maintain two codebases. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:38:55 -0500 > Subject: Re: FW: Matlab equivalents needed (yes very original) > From: address@hidden > To: address@hidden > > > For (2) do any of these solve the issue? > > tmpnam > tmpfile > mkstemp > > > > The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. Get busy. > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > Something like <hostname>.<PID> is sufficient for a unique ID - because hosts have unique name in a cluster, and PID is unique in a host. > > Maybe <hostname>.<PID>.<current_time_since_the_epoch> . > > Regards, > Sergei. > > > The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |