[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:47:48 -0700 (PDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Damian Harty <address@hidden>
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 5:13 PM
> Subject: RE: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer
>
[snip]
> ...but Fourier is predicated on the whole signal having the characteristics
> of
> the observed portion.
[snip]
> Regards,
>
> Damian Harty
> Senior Research Fellow
> Coventry University
> +44(0)24 7688 8924
> +44(0)7799 414832
>
Yes and no.
Actually, no.
I mean Fourier (without the "Fast") transform is defined through integral from
minus infinity to plus infinity.
DFT (i.e. Discrete Fourier Transform) is a transform defined on a _finite_ set
of N samples. Anf no integral is involved, but a sum of products.
FFT (i.e. Fast Fourier Transform) is a way to implement DFT in a smarter way
which reduces computational complexity from O(N ^ 2) to N * log(N).
So, regarding FFT, your "Fourier is predicated on the whole signal" statement
is wrong WRT DFT/FFT.
Regards,
Sergei.
- FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Renato S. Yamane, 2012/06/09
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/06/10
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Thomas D. Dean, 2012/06/10
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Markus Bergholz, 2012/06/10
- RE: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Damian Harty, 2012/06/11
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2012/06/11
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/06/11
- RE: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Damian Harty, 2012/06/11
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Francesco Potortì, 2012/06/11
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Robert T. Short, 2012/06/11
- Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer,
Sergei Steshenko <=
Re: FFT - Spectrum Analyzer, Peter, 2012/06/11