[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: R: help on Octave
From: |
Martin Helm |
Subject: |
Re: R: help on Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:27:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 |
Am 26.06.2012 16:35, schrieb Martin Helm:
> I can check in a few hours on a Win7.
Just for the files, I tested a bit with Win7 64bit with 4GB (but the
32bit octave).
I can allocate roughly 2 GB (so a x = rand(14500) for example is no problem.
Also the scriptlet given does not break when the size of the matrix is
larger than 6200.
Since that was with 3.6.2, it is maybe worth updating your windows install.
On the other hand it still remains valid what Jordi said and I as well:
Use sparse matrices and avoid inverses by solving linear systems instead.
As it is now you just fill your memory with gigabytes of zeros.
- help on Octave, Pierpaolo, 2012/06/26
- Re: help on Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/06/26
- Re: help on Octave, Martin Helm, 2012/06/26
- Re: help on Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/06/26
- Re: help on Octave, Martin Helm, 2012/06/26
- R: help on Octave, Pierpaolo, 2012/06/26
- Re: R: help on Octave, Martin Helm, 2012/06/26
- Re: R: help on Octave, Martin Helm, 2012/06/26
- Re: R: help on Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/06/26
- Re: R: help on Octave,
Martin Helm <=
- Re: help on Octave, Michael Goffioul, 2012/06/27
- R: help on Octave, Pierpaolo, 2012/06/27
- Re: R: help on Octave, Martin Helm, 2012/06/27
- R: R: help on Octave, Pierpaolo, 2012/06/29
- Re: R: R: help on Octave, c., 2012/06/29
- Re: R: R: help on Octave, c., 2012/06/29
- R: help on Octave, Pierpaolo, 2012/06/26
Re: help on Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/06/26