[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OctaveForge for project of the month
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: OctaveForge for project of the month |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:32:58 -0700 (PDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Carnë Draug <address@hidden>
> To: Octave Help <address@hidden>; Octave Forge <address@hidden>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:52 AM
> Subject: OctaveForge for project of the month
>
> Hi everyone
>
> SourceForge has a "project of the month" voting pool going on which
> includes OctaveForge. If you guys want to vote, the link for the post
> and pool are
>
> http://sourceforge.net/blog/potm-vote-201211/
> http://twtpoll.com/vvntro
>
> Note 1: it requires a twitter account (it sucks, I already complained)
> Note 2: Octave Forge is listed as GNU Octave repository. I have also
> complained about this and they have fixed it on their blog. However
> they could not change the name on the voting after it started (the
> name is incorrect because the description of the project on
> SourceForge was also incorrect. That has already been fixed).
>
> Carnë
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
Absolutely and definitely _____no_____.
I.e. I am wholeheartedly _against_.
Here are the reasons:
1) visit http://octave.sourceforge.net/functions_by_package.php and _patiently_
scroll down;
2) if you are patient enough, you'll notice that the text left margin moves to
the right, i.e. at the top the text is left-justified as it should be, bu then
the text moves to the right;
3) when I was taught by various people how to develop and test the code, I was
explained that number of test cases is typically (quite) big, but at least
_obvious_ corner cases should be tested, and the number of obvious corner cases
is typically _much_ less than the full number of test cases;
4) in this particular instance there are just _two_ corner cases: top and
bottom, and the developers didn't bother to check even them.
So, because of _gross_ disrespect for very basic QA guidelines on the side of
the developers I am fully opposed to nominating this project for "project of
the month".
Regards,
Sergei.
P.S. Kindergarten .....