[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: When will the new GUI be ready?
From: |
Israel Herraiz |
Subject: |
Re: When will the new GUI be ready? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:46:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Sup/git |
Excerpts from Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso's message of Mon Oct 29 19:19:34 +0100
2012:
> And you fixed them. Looks like we could really use your help. I wish
> you hadn't completely forked off the GUI. I think it's gonna be very
> difficult to integrate your changes back in. Perhaps we can just
> replace our fork with yours?
Go ahead. I would be very glad to see some of my code in Octave :). I
have some time constraints, so I am not sure how involved I could be
myself, but if any of what I have written might be useful for Octave,
I am really glad to share it. It is GPL code after all :).
The main differences of this GUI with Octave are its MATLAB-isms.
For instance, in octave_main_thread I use the options -q and
--traditional, and in octave_link::launch_octave I launch octave in
embedded mode with quit_allowed=false.
The load and save workspace options also use MAT files, for better
MATLAB compatibility.
The editor also uses the MATLAB lexer instead of the Octave one.
Other than that, I think there are not more MATLAB-isms in my code.
Anyway, I have pulled the GUI from the Hg repository, and I am now
reading the current GUI code, to see if I could submit patches for the
workspace and the history command list, which I think are the main
causes of instability. If I do that, I will send my patches to the
maintainers list and/or the tracker at Savannah.
Cheers,
Israel
- Re: When will the new GUI be ready?, (continued)
Re: When will the new GUI be ready?, Andrew Crane-Droesch, 2012/10/28
Re: When will the new GUI be ready?, Wolfgang Lindner, 2012/10/29
Re: When will the new GUI be ready?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/10/29
Re: When will the new GUI be ready?, andrewcd, 2012/10/29