[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPU and GNu Octave
From: |
Francesco Potortì |
Subject: |
Re: GPU and GNu Octave |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:24:31 +0100 |
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InternalDistribution
>> Seems pretty clear on this issue, and to support the assertion above.
>
>I suppose I could be mistaken, but it seems to me like an employee
>within the company could assert that her employer or colleague gave
>her a GPL-violating binary and demand her GPL rights or notify the
>author of the GPL-covered work of a copyright violation.
I am not a lawyer, and even if I were, I would not give free legal
advice :)
Anyway, distribution happens when you cross the boundaries of a legal
entity. If I take a GPL program and link it with whatever I like, I am
not violating anything, as I am not distributing it. If I give it to my
employee in the context of my relationship with him as an employee, I am
still not distributing it, and again I am not violating the GPL.
Again, the FAQ quoted above looks pretty clear to me in this regard.