Re: equivalent for C-style init: structname varname[] = {...} ?

[Sergei Steshenko]

--- On Mon, 11/19/12, Judd Storrs <address@hidden> wrote:

From: Judd Storrs <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: equivalent for C-style init: structname varname[] = {...} ?
To: "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Sergei Steshenko" <address@hidden>, "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Date: Monday, November 19, 2012, 8:08 AM

Ug. That "bug" was a very nice feature for reading in text files. THANK YOU SO 
VERY MUCH I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY WITH YOUR COMMIT BIT TYRANNY.

--judd


Judd,

thank you very much for expressing my very same feelings.

Looking at Octave development process and at thing committed (not in SW sense, 
but in English language sense) by Jordi I'm getting stronger and stronger 
feeling that probably Jordi is on Mathworks payroll to subvert Octave.

OTOH, I am trying to never forget 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor .

Regards,
  Sergei.



On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:

On 18 November 2012 15:19, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote:




>> "The fieldnames in a struct are subject to the same constraints that

>> variable names are" - no they are not:



There was a bug that allowed them to be set to anything with setfield

and getfield. I have already fixed this bug:



    http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/126285fce876



- Jordi G. H.

_______________________________________________

Help-octave mailing list

address@hidden

https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave