[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who wants the splines-gcvspl package?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Who wants the splines-gcvspl package? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:09:56 -0500 |
On 17 January 2013 14:59, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 14:41, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> On 17 Jan 2013, at 06:20, Ed Meyer <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you know if the ACM algorithms have an acceptable license?
>
>> As far as I know, they don't. I recall recent discussion in the mailing
>> list about including AMOS in Octave that did not work out.
>
> Yeah, the ACM doesn't get free software. The old Netlib code is all
> under a very dubious and hazy copyright status.
I should add, to be fair, when Netlib was being written, people
weren't even sure that you could copyright software to begin with. Ah,
those were the days... :-)
- Jordi G. H.