[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Why Octave"
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: "Why Octave" |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:45:58 -0800 (PST) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: "address@hidden Help" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 4:30 AM
> Subject: Re: "Why Octave"
>
> On Feb 2, 2013, at 8:37 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> I am Taban,
>>
>> Ben, i am a Electronics engineering student and i am studying on image
> proccessing for my project. I researched something about comparing matlab and
> octave. So appereantly matlab is faster, have much more toolboxes, well
> documented etc. But it is expensive. I am a software developer also, and i
> like
> free software philosophy. I want to use Octave.
>>
>> So can you give me a leg to stand on, give me a few reason can be answer to
> question that "Why Octave?" or Why are you using Octave instead of
> Matlab ?
>>
>> Thanks
>
> I''ve cc'd the help list for Octave. You'll likely get a lot of
> opinions for why others use Octave.
>
> I use Octave because I enjoy contributing to its development and its GNU
> license
> ensures I'll be able to continue. I also favor the comfort of knowing that
> my use of Octave isn't contingent on a financial obligation.
>
> Even so, I am also a Matlab user (for work).
>
> Ben
>
Also consider Scilab: http://www.scilab.org/ . I used it before Octave, and
both tools have their (dis)advantages.
IIRC I'm using Octave since 2007.
Regards,
Sergei.