[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aw: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS)
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Aw: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS) |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:05:55 -0700 (PDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden>
> To: Christoph Ellenberger <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 4:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Aw: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS)
>
> --- On Wed, 2013/3/27, Christoph Ellenberger wrote:
>> > --- On Wed, 2013/3/27, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>> > > --- On Wed, 2013/3/27, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
>> > > > --- On Tue, 2013/3/26, Christoph Ellenberger wrote:
>> > > > > I am experiencing some strange behavior and wanted to
> check if it is a bug or me....
>> > > > > It happens when I try to read in and manipulating some
> ascii data files. It only happens with the VS version of octave. (tested with
> several gcc versions on windows and didn't showed up).
>> > > > > Ok here is some example code to reproduce:
>> > > > > First generating an ascii file:
>> > > > > s="0123456789";
>> > > > > for i=1:21, s=cstrcat(s,s);,endfor
>> > > > > save TestData.dat s
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Then readin and manipulate:
>> > > > > fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > > s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > > fclose(fid);
>> > > > > s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Clear all and repeat:
>> > > > > clear all
>> > > > >
>> > > > > fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > > s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > > fclose(fid);
>> > > > > s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Depending on datasize and how many replacement were
> performed it either fails on the new readin or regexprep with a: "error:
> out of memory or dimension too large for Octave's index type"
>> > > > > Any help is appreciated
>> > > > > Christoph
>> > > >
>> > > > I have tested on octave-3.6.2 VS, 3.6.2 MinGW, 3.7.2+ VS and
> 3.6.2 cygwin
>> > > > (win 7 64 bit Home premium, 4GB memory)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. octave-3.6.2 VS and 3.6.2
> MinGW*****************************
>> > > > >> fid =
> fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> > > > >> fclose(fid);
>> > > > >> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > > >> clear all
>> > > > >> fid =
> fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > error: memory exhausted or requested size too large for
> range of Octave's index type -- trying to return to prompt
>> > > >
> ********************************************************************
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2. octave-3.7.2+ VS*****************************
>> > > > >> fid =
> fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> > > > >> fclose(fid);
>> > > > >> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > > >> clear all
>> > > > >> fid =
> fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > error: out of memory or dimension too large for Octave's
> index type
>> > > >
> ********************************************************************
>> > > >
>> > > > 3.Octave-3.6.2
> Cygwin**********************************************
>> > > > >> fid =
> fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > >> fclose(fid);
>> > > > >> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > > >> clear all
>> > > > >> fid =
> fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > > >> fclose(fid);
>> > > > >> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > >
> ********************************************************************
>> > > >
>> > > > For me, both VS and MinGW version caused problem. Cygwin
> version seemed to work correctly.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > >
>> > > > Tatsuro
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I have also tested on
>> > > octave-3.2.4 and 3.4.3 MinGW version.
>> > >
>> > > 4. octave-3.2.4 and 3.4.3 MinGW *****************************
>> > > >> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> > > >> fclose(fid);
>> > > >> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > >> clear all
>> > > >> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> > > >> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> > > warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> > > >> fclose(fid);
>> > > >> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > > **************************************************
>> > >
>> > > The problem seemed to be happened on octave-3.6 or later on
> native windows.
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > >
>> > > Tatsuro
>> >
>> > Sorry for successive post.
>> >
>> > I have tested the following :
>> >
>> > %*********************************
>> > s="0123456789";
>> > for i=1:21, s=cstrcat(s,s);,endfor
>> > save TestData.dat s
>> > load TestData.dat
>> > s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > clear all
>> > load TestData.dat
>> > s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> > %*********************************
>> >
>> > The above worked correctly on octave-3.2.4 (MinGW), 3.4.3 (MinGW),
> 3.6.2 (MinGW,VS, Cygwin) and 3.7.2+ (VS).
>> >
>> > I think that the problem does not rely on regexprep but on fscanf for
> large data.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Tatsuro
>> >
>> Thank you very much for the fast confirmation of the same problem. Actually
> it must be a strange combination of both I tested:
>>
>> octave-3.7.2+ VS*****************************
>> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> fclose(fid);
>> clear all
>> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> fclose(fid);
>> clear all
>> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> fclose(fid);
>> clear all
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> So it can't be fscanf only. On the other hand I tested as well (because
> your last example the second regexprep does nothing, as all 0 were already
> exchanged)
>>
>> octave-3.7.2+ VS*****************************
>> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> fclose(fid);
>> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
>> s = regexprep(s,'1','2');
>> s = regexprep(s,'2','3');
>> error: out of memory or dimension too large for Octave's index type
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> So it clearly also depends on how many replacements are performed within
> the regexprep. (same fails as well in 3.6.0_gcc4.6.2 and 3.2.4_gcc4.4.0)
>> As something like this always works:
>>
>> octave-3.7.2+ VS*****************************
>> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> fclose(fid);
>> s = ctsrcat(s,"aaaaaaaaa", s);
>> s = regexprep(s,'a','2');
>> clear all
>> fid = fopen("TestData.dat","r");
>> s = fscanf(fid,'%c');
>> warning: range error for conversion to character value
>> fclose(fid);
>> clear all
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Christoph
>
> You are right.
> #**************************************
> s="0123456789";
> for i=1:21, s=cstrcat(s,s);,endfor
>
> s = regexprep(s,'0','2');
> s = regexprep(s,'1','2');
> s = regexprep(s,'2','3');
> #**************************************
>
> The above caused 'out of memory ...' or 'memory exhausted ...'
> on octave 3.7.2+(VS),
> 3.6.2(VS, MinGW), 3.4.3 (MinGW) and 3.2.4 (MinGW).
>
> But for cygwin version octave(3.6.2), the above test did not cause memory
> error.
>
> I think that it is better that you resist this strange behavior of regexprep
> as
> a bug to the bug tracker.
>
> Regards
>
> Tatsuro
> _______________________________________________
I've tried the above code on self-built octave-3.6.4 under Linux.
Memory consumption constantly grows, I killed the session when memory
consumption reached 2.5G.
I think it's a bug, and since I can reproduce the failure under Linux, the bug
is not OS-specific.
Regards,
Sergei.
- memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Christoph Ellenberger, 2013/03/26
- Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2013/03/26
- Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2013/03/27
- Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2013/03/27
- Aw: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Christoph Ellenberger, 2013/03/27
- Re: Aw: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2013/03/27
- Re: Aw: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS),
Sergei Steshenko <=
- Aw: Re: Re: memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Christoph Ellenberger, 2013/03/28
- memory leak in regexprep ? (windows/3.7.2+/VS), Paryshaan, 2013/03/29