[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SQP - Reducing Vector Size?
From: |
jjmilburn |
Subject: |
SQP - Reducing Vector Size? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:24:50 -0700 (PDT) |
I am implementing SQP, using the following functions for my objective and
inequality constraints, respectively:
function obj = cost (w)
obj = 0.5*norm(w(1,1:columns(w)-1))^2;
obj;
endfunction
function c2 = inEq (w)
for i=1:50
% the below commented line (without w index reference)
works.
% c2(i,:) = w * 12.5-4;
% this is a test, the line below does not work
c2(i,:) = w(i)*12.5-4;
end
endfunction
When I run sqp via the following : sqpOut=sqp(0, @cost,[],@inEq), I receive
the error:
error: A(I): Index exceeds matrix dimension.
error: called from:
error: conEq at line 21, column 11
error: /usr/share/octave/3.2.4/m/optimization/sqp.m at line 361, column 8
error: /home/josh/octaveExperiment/data/trainSVM.m at line 44, column 7
When I perform a "size(w)" before running sqp, I get the following:
ans = 1 51
when I perform a "size(w)" after running the above sqp, I get the following:
ans = 1 1
Questions:
1) Why is SQP changing the size of my decision variable (w) vector?
2) how do I remedy this or modify my code to make it not behave in this
way?
As noted in the code comments, I am able to get this to work if I do not
reference w by index.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/SQP-Reducing-Vector-Size-tp4652246.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- SQP - Reducing Vector Size?,
jjmilburn <=