[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: empty arrays of objects
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: empty arrays of objects |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2013 19:19:48 -0400 |
On 20 May 2013 20:04, ernst <address@hidden> wrote:
> Tell me, why does class([]) yield double?
That's just the default class, so it's also the class of the default
empty matrix.
> And why does seemingly buitlin-arrayfun not work on objects?
I'm not sure what exactly you mean here with "not work".
> And, above all, why does
>
> octave:28> a=arrayfun(@pn, [])
> a = [](0x0)
> octave:29> class(a)
> ans = double
>
> not lead to some pn-object as
> arrayfun(@pn, [1 2 3]) does?
Because the function @pn is never called since the matrix is empty.
If you create an empty array from an array that isn't empty, you'll
get an empty array of the class you want:
x = int32(42);
y = x(false);
Perhaps we do need a better way to create empty arrays of arbitrary
classes. I am not sure if zeros(0,0,"pn") will work for your
user-defined pn class.
- Jordi G. H.