[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.0.5 ECCN Number
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.0.5 ECCN Number |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:57:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 06/10/2013 10:27 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 10 June 2013 10:16, Agoos, Ian F PW
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I am attempting to determine the US Export Control Classification Number for
>> Octave 3.0.5, and have been unable to find it posted online.
> Why should Octave have an ECCN?
>
> What's the ECCN for, say, Linux?
>
> - Jordi G. H.
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
Jordi,
Everything has a ECCN even a conversation in the street with a
non-resident (ie "deemed-export") has an ECCN. I looked in to this a few
years back, and you can see the thread at
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Export-control-td4636642.html
where after looking at the possible ECCNs that might cover Octave, the
only possible code seems to be EAR99, the catch all that covers
everything. Though you might need to apply for commodity status
http://www.bis.doc.gov/licensing/cclrequestguidance.html
Yes Linux has an ECCN as well, for example
http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/licenses/ProductTechnologyMatrix.pdf
David