[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: version differences
From: |
Torsten |
Subject: |
Re: version differences |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jul 2013 21:07:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 04.07.2013 06:50, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> On 04.07.2013, at 06:11, kbphinix <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I always wonder, when mature software application like
>> "octave" updates to new versions. Is the change in version
>> necessary so often? If one is able to use say, octave3.2.3, for
>> most of one's work (e.g. control systems modelling), what real
>> benefit one gets ? No offence intended. --kbphinix
>
> Well, there is a HUGE difference between the current control package
> version 2.4.2 (which requires Octave 3.6.x) and the old
> control-1.0.11 for Octave 3.2.3.
> ...
I second that. Especially when using octave for control systems analysis
and design you really should give version 3.6.x with control package
2.4.2 a try.
Lukas, on this occasion, thanks for the control package!
Torsten
- version differences, kbphinix, 2013/07/04
- Re: version differences, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/07/04
- Re: version differences,
Torsten <=
- Re: version differences, marco atzeri, 2013/07/04
- Re: version differences, c., 2013/07/04
- Re: version differences, Richard KIrk, 2013/07/04
- Re: version differences, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/07/04