[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
Re: Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:59:14 +0200 |
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Stefan Mahr <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Hummmm ... I've developped high performance acquisition solutions over
>> > years. My advice is NOT to try to design some ONE-DO-IT-ALL tool. You are
>> > mixing problems and constraints, bug in one piece of the code turn may
>> > contaminate other part of the design ...
>> >
>> Ther eis GPIB implemented in the instrumnet-control package have you
>> tried using it?
>> http://wiki.octave.org/Instrument_control_package
>
> The instrument control package is fair for rapid prototyping and simple test
> setups, but I would not recommend it for any complex or high performance
> solution yet.
>
> Stefan
If so, user may improve it. Please use it and improve it or at least
report bug/improvements
- Aw: Re: Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, (continued)
- Aw: Re: Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/12
- Re: Aw: Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, martine1212, 2013/07/13
- Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/13
- Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, martine1212, 2013/07/13
- Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, martine1212, 2013/07/13
- Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/13
- Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/13
Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, CdeMills, 2013/07/12
Re: GPIB serial poll of an instrument, Ron.Simonson, 2013/07/12