On 07/24/2015 02:14 AM, Jan-Peter
Schümann wrote:
What I do not like about this solution is filesize, the fact
that I have to reduce my data points to approx 100 to reduce
graphics size to 2MB and the fact that the "surface" looks like
it has been made out of many little coloured tiles. And of
course, it takes quite a while to compile the .m-file.
The question is: does anybody know a better way of doing this?
The figure you included in your email is a png file of 831x483
pixels, looks fairly decent, and as a size of 225kB. Is that still
too large? You can drop the resolution further using imagemagick (
convert figure3.png -resize 540x480 f.png), or generating the figure
at lower pixel density in the first place.
|