[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i"
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i" |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Dec 2015 23:48:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 18:33:31 -0500, Nicholas Jankowski wrote:
> are there "octave only" flags set somewhere for interpreter behavior?
> things that wouldn't matter to any m-code because it only affects
> interpreter display? I'd have a hard time imagining that the display
> itself would be a compatiblity issue (unless someone was reading the output
> stream, and strcmp'ing it expecting i... But they would have had to
> deliberately set j in Octave... dunno.)
Yes, see the "see also" for "format". Some of these functions set Octave
specific options, some overlap with "format" (e.g. output_precision).
--
mike
- Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i", D Greig, 2015/12/03
- Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i", Nicholas Jankowski, 2015/12/03
- Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i", Mike Miller, 2015/12/03
- Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i", Nicholas Jankowski, 2015/12/03
- Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i", Mike Miller, 2015/12/03
- Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i", Nicholas Jankowski, 2015/12/03
- Re: Complex numbers, format preferences, "j" rather than "i",
Mike Miller <=