|
From: | Julien Bect |
Subject: | Re: Naming discrepancy |
Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2016 07:58:24 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 |
Le 27/04/2016 06:40, Colin Macdonald a écrit :
On 26/04/16 18:19, Clinton Winant wrote:The package specfun contains the script heaviside, NOT Heaviside. The help file as well as the octave-forge reference have examples that use the incorrect spelling, while the function file name is spelled correctly.The Specfun pkg is not maintained. I've recently incorporated heaviside.m into the Symbolic pkg. https://github.com/cbm755/octsympy/blob/master/inst/heaviside.m I'd be happy for any further patches or pull requests if you'd like to proofread.
@Colin: The specfun package isn't marked as unmaintained on the Octave Forge website. It appears to be maintained by "The Octave Community".
It is true that heaviside.m has recently been removed from specfun's default branch by Carnë, but as long as there is no new release, heaviside is still officially part of specfun (release 1.1.0 from 2011-12).
@Clinton: As you probably understand now, your remark is correct, but this issue will not be fixed since the next release of specfun will no longer contain the heaviside function.
HTH, Julien.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |