Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?

help-octave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?

From:	Nicholas Jankowski
Subject:	Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?
Date:	Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:43:09 -0500

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Suever <address@hidden> wrote:

It's worth noting that the OP was using the second example on the online documentation as a guide which also incorrectly transposes the first two inputs. I have submitted a bug report to the bug tracker.

good catch! I missed that.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/12/29
- Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?, Jonathan Suever, 2016/12/30
  - Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?, Nicholas Jankowski <=

Prev by Date: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?
Next by Date: Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?
Previous by thread: Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread