[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?
From: |
siko1056 |
Subject: |
Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop? |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:38:21 -0700 (PDT) |
JuanPi wrote
> [1]:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/miscellaneous/ci/default/tree/inst/hilbert_curve.m
> [2]: https://bitbucket.org/KaKiLa/mymfiles/src/tip/hilbert_curve_nr.m
Juan,
I tried both of your algorithms and have no deeper insight into the Hilbert
curves, but I think your algorithm computes "more" than you expected. For n
= 2^2 I get using [1] 16 (x,y) coordinates and using [2] 256 complex
coordinates. Plotting both images shows me that [2] created a much higher
order Hilbert curve.
HTH,
Kai
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/OF-miscellaneous-Hilbert-curve-recursion-faster-than-loop-tp4684339p4684354.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, JuanPi, 2017/08/05
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?,
siko1056 <=
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, siko1056, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, Julien Bect, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, siko1056, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2017/08/07
- Re: [OF miscellaneous] Hilbert curve: recursion faster than loop?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2017/08/07