Re: Implementing AbsTol for quadcc

[Nicholas Jankowski]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Pantxo <address@hidden> wrote:

NJank wrote

> Rik, can you or someone else check the following against your newly pushed
> quadcc? this throws an error in the 4.2,1 release version. unless it's
> something now fixed in your version I think it calls for a bug report.  I
> stumbled on it when I tried to pass a function of x only to integral2:
>
>>> quadv(@(x) 1, 0,1)
> ans = 1
>>> quad(@(x) 1, 0,1)
> ans = 1
>>> quadgk(@(x) 1, 0,1)
> ans = 1
>>> quadcc(@(x) 1, 0,1)
> error: quadcc: integrand F must return a single, real-valued vector
>

> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list

> Help-octave@

> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-octave

>> The function F must be vectorized and must return a vector of output
>> values if given a vector of input values

understood. but quadgk is also has the same requirement, but doesn't choke on the function. what does it do differently?