[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope
From: |
Renato S. Yamane |
Subject: |
Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:25:47 +0100 |
2017-12-14 14:41 GMT+01:00 Maynard Wright <address@hidden>:
> On Thursday, December 14, 2017 08:39:08 AM Renato S. Yamane wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the code below, someone have an idea why I have this limit
>> in low frequencies?
>>
>> [...]
>
> At first glance, I notice that "length" is misspelled as "lenght" in the
> function noise().
But, of course, this is not the problem...
You can write it even as "lengghhttyy" if it's defined in the
beggining of the code.
Thanks,
Renato
- [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/14
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/14
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/15
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/15
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/16
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Ozzy Lash, 2017/12/17