[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope
From: |
Maynard Wright |
Subject: |
Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:42:28 -0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.16.0-30-generic; KDE/4.13.3; i686; ; ) |
On Thursday, December 14, 2017 03:25:47 PM Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> 2017-12-14 14:41 GMT+01:00 Maynard Wright <address@hidden>:
> > On Thursday, December 14, 2017 08:39:08 AM Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> >> Regarding the code below, someone have an idea why I have this limit
> >> in low frequencies?
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > At first glance, I notice that "length" is misspelled as "lenght" in the
> > function noise().
>
> But, of course, this is not the problem...
> You can write it even as "lengghhttyy" if it's defined in the
> beggining of the code.
>
> Thanks,
> Renato
True: maybe it's just the proofreader coming out in me.
Thanks,
Maynard
- [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/14
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/14
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/15
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/15
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/16
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Robert T. Short, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Ozzy Lash, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Signal PKG] limited slope, Renato S. Yamane, 2017/12/18