[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reverse function numerically
From: |
stn021 |
Subject: |
Re: Reverse function numerically |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:49:28 +0100 |
Hello all,
thanks for the ideas.
I have been busy so it took me a while to get back to you.
So far I have checked out the hint of Stephen Montgomery-Smith, which
was fsolve().
That essentially does the same as I have previously done with
leasqr(), only a bit more efficient.
With leasqr() it takes about 150ms to calculate one single value. With
fsolve() it gets done in 90ms.
That is an improvement of course but I had hoped to find something
more significant.
For comparison: the "forward"-function takes about 5 microseconds per value.
@Juan Pablo Carbajal
The function in my example is not the actual function but it has a
very similar shape.
Specifically the two intersecting (almost-)planes are similar and the
limit of all variables in the range of 0..1 is also given.
So I believe that any solutions for the example would work on the
original functions as well
The actual modeling-function involves lots of sums of nonlinear
functions and would IMO not help at this point.
I continue work on the matter ...
THX for now, Stefan
- Reverse function numerically, stn021, 2018/01/28
- Re: Reverse function numerically, stn021, 2018/01/28
- Re: Reverse function numerically, Steven Dorsher, 2018/01/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Reverse function numerically, stn021, 2018/01/28
- Re: Reverse function numerically, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen, 2018/01/28
- Message not available
- Fwd: Reverse function numerically, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2018/01/31
- Re: Reverse function numerically,
stn021 <=
- Re: Reverse function numerically, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2018/01/31
Re: Reverse function numerically, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen, 2018/01/31