Re: Implementing advanced scientific calculator.

[Mike Miller]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:45:26 -0700, Sebastian Schöps wrote:
> By the way, I do
> not see why it should be of interest for the Octave community to write a
> translator from Octave to Julia?

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 19:03:36 +0000, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> 1) Julia is a much better language from the point of view of consistency
> and human understanding, so ultimately one should better switch to Julia
> and not lose the ability to use already developed Matlab/Octave code;

I think the implication is that Sergei believes the Octave community
should be spending its time and energy encouraging people to use tools
other than Octave.

-- 
mike

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature